IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Waugh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-26 Country: USA
Western New England
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 55 5 9 14 0.255 0.0935 0.0940 0.2686 0.2700
2025-26 Ogden Mustangs NCDC 54 8 24 32 0.593 0.2416 0.2305 0.4763 0.4545
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
48%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20819
Forward overall
#1124
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Western New England Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Camille Marcoux
0.33
actual FR PPG at Western New England
Kevin Leonard
0.59
actual FR PPG at Western New England
Connor Geshan
0.38
actual FR PPG at Western New England
Philippe Longchamps
0.75
actual FR PPG at Western New England

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Lavery
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2024-25
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Doden
Augsburg · 2007-08
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bobby Hineman
Adrian · 2006-07
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.