← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emerson Marshall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-08 Country: USA
Colby
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 29 9 21 30 1.034 0.2049 0.2049 0.4713 0.4713
2023-24 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 32 22 29 51 1.594 0.3157 0.3157 0.7261 0.7261
2024-25 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 49 3 7 10 0.204 0.0750 0.0762 0.2154 0.2187
2025-26 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 57 19 39 58 1.018 0.3738 0.3611 1.0740 1.0376
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14661
Forward overall
#734
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Colby Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

1.04
actual FR PPG at Colby
0.38
actual FR PPG at Colby
0.73
actual FR PPG at Colby
0.75
actual FR PPG at Colby

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2009-10
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2017-18
1.034 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2022-23
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.