IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Lasker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-18 Country: USA
UMass Boston
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 34 2 7 9 0.265 0.0973 0.0961 0.2798 0.2763
2025-26 — NCDC 46 6 9 15 0.326 0.1330 0.1245 0.2609 0.2443
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35549
Forward overall
#2154
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

UMass Boston Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Josh Haverstrom
0.50
actual FR PPG at UMass Boston
Dominic Blad
0.25
actual FR PPG at UMass Boston
Gabriel Chuckran
0.32
actual FR PPG at UMass Boston
Brett Calhoun
0.53
actual FR PPG at UMass Boston

D2/3 Comparables

Brock Forrest
Chatham · 2023-24
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jameson Raymond
Lawrence · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dominic Schimizzi
Hobart · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.