IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maddox Tulacro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-06-27 Country: USA
Amherst
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 45 0 2 2 0.044 0.0171 0.0177 0.0646 0.0668
2024-25 — NAHL 40 2 6 8 0.200 0.0735 0.0736 0.2114 0.2117
2025-26 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 47 7 16 23 0.489 0.1798 0.1712 0.5172 0.4924
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14590
Defenseman overall
#2789
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Amherst Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Michael Rowbotham
0.64
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Chris Roll
0.37
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Joshua Burke
0.69
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Johnny Small
0.48
actual FR PPG at Amherst

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Bottem
Marian · 2023-24
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Corey Domenico
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Lewis
Lake Forest · 2012-13
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.