IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Preskar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-02-13 Country: USA
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Chippewa Steel NAHL 35 2 3 5 0.143 0.0525 0.0568 0.1508 0.1633
2025-26 Chippewa Steel NAHL 25 9 6 15 0.600 0.2204 0.2278 0.6333 0.6546
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26082
Forward overall
#850
Forward born in 2007
#2141
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Mackenzie MacEachern
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Nils Forselius
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.63
actual FR PPG at Army
Adam Marshall
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.32
actual FR PPG at Army
Reese Farrell
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.25
actual FR PPG at Army
Stephen Willey
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.17
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Fennell
Tufts · 2021-22
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Kielich
SUNY Brockport · 2012-13
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shannon McNevan
Bowdoin · 2000-01
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.