← New Search ↗ Social Card

Troy Hunka Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-06 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Robert Morris
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Ogden Mustangs NCDC 50 16 26 42 0.840 0.3425 0.3544 0.6722 0.6955
2025-26 El Paso Rhinos NAHL 58 28 57 85 1.466 0.5384 0.5291 1.5489 1.5221
2026-27 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1475 0.1475 0.7502 0.7502
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4752
Forward overall
#95
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Robert Morris Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2018-19
0.19
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris
NAHL 2021-22
0.19
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris
CCHL 2014-15
0.10
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris
NAHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Robert Morris

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2018-19
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2011-12
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.