← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brayden Sprickman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-07-04 Country: USA
University of New England
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 West Chester Wolves NCDC 50 6 33 39 0.780 0.3180 0.3196 0.6270 0.6302
2025-26 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 56 10 18 28 0.500 0.1837 0.1751 0.5278 0.5030
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2947
Defenseman overall
#746
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

University of New England Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.73
actual FR PPG at University of New England
0.48
actual FR PPG at University of New England
0.63
actual FR PPG at University of New England
0.72
actual FR PPG at University of New England

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2008-09
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.