IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isaac Suh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-29 Country: USA
Air Force
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 23 0 2 2 0.087 0.0355 0.0391 0.0699 0.0769
2025-26 — NAHL 31 0 8 8 0.258 0.0948 0.0993 0.2724 0.2855
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#50562
Forward overall
#2448
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG

Air Force Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Owen DuBois
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.21
actual FR PPG at Air Force
Holt Oliphant
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.33
actual FR PPG at Air Force
Aidan Willis
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.29
actual FR PPG at Air Force
Trevor Stone
USPHL-Premier-Classic 2014-15
0.46
actual FR PPG at Air Force

D2/3 Comparables

Andrei Buchko
Concordia · 2015-16
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Van Horn
Adrian · 2014-15
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Prattson
Trinity · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.