IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Bosland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-14 Country: USA
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 — BCHL 47 0 9 9 0.192 0.0738 0.0756 0.2787 0.2854
2024-25 — BCHL 55 1 16 17 0.309 0.1191 0.1160 0.4498 0.4380
2025-26 Blackfalds Bulldogs BCHL 54 3 19 22 0.407 0.1570 0.1471 0.5929 0.5556
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13993
Defenseman overall
#2730
Defenseman born in 2005
#2393
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Owen Nolan
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.12
actual FR PPG at Army
Jude Brower
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.07
actual FR PPG at Army
Brad Zona
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army
Blake Box
BCHL 2013-14
0.14
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Kussmann
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Adkins
Concordia · 2015-16
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kelby Lorenz
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.