← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michal Marsalek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-06-27 Country: Slovakia
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Brooks Bandits BCHL 35 2 8 10 0.286 0.1101 0.1208 0.4155 0.4559
2026-27 Brooks Bandits BCHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0771 0.0771 0.2909 0.2909
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16343
Defenseman overall
#989
Defenseman born in 2008
#2672
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USPHL-Premier-Classic 2014-15
0.00
actual FR PPG at Maine
NAHL 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Maine
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Maine
OJHL 2019-20
0.32
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Roger Williams · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Alvernia · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.