IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michal Marsalek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-06-27 Country: Slovakia
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Brooks Bandits BCHL 35 2 8 10 0.286 0.1101 0.1208 0.4158 0.4562
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16126
Defenseman overall
#886
Defenseman born in 2008
#2575
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Teemu Kivihalme
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Nash Worden
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Army (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Luke Shiplo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Beaulieu
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Dawson Bruneski
AJHL 2016-17
0.00
actual FR PPG at Maine
Levi Kleiboer
SJHL 2015-16
0.17
actual FR PPG at Maine
Brandon Chabrier
USHL 2019-20
0.18
actual FR PPG at Maine
Simon Butala
NAHL 2015-16
0.06
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Emmond Bell
Norwich · 2004-05
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Garrett Hallford
Trine · 2014-15
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Meeh
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2012-13
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.