← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Lapointe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-06-05 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Arizona State
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 60 1 10 11 0.183 0.1362 0.1403 0.6840 0.7045
2023-24 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 53 1 8 9 0.170 0.1262 0.1235 0.6336 0.6201
2024-25 Chicago Steel USHL 58 1 10 11 0.190 0.1119 0.1124 0.5697 0.5721
2025-26 Tri-City Storm USHL 45 6 3 9 0.200 0.1180 0.1128 0.6007 0.5742
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13528
Defenseman overall
#2511
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Arizona State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2021-22
0.31
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
USHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
USHL 2014-15
0.20
actual FR PPG at Arizona State

D2/3 Comparables

Assumption · 2016-17
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2018-19
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.