← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandt Dubey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-02-12 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Colgate
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Tri-City Storm USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 57 0 3 3 0.053 0.0193 0.0209 0.0555 0.0602
2024-25 NAHL 59 4 11 15 0.254 0.0934 0.0965 0.2683 0.2771
2025-26 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 58 2 16 18 0.310 0.1830 0.1721 0.9320 0.8764
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13677
Defenseman overall
#2532
Defenseman born in 2006
#3589
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Colgate Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

CCHL 2018-19
0.27
actual FR PPG at Colgate
USHS-MN 2023-24
0.40
actual FR PPG at Colgate
OJHL 2015-16
0.16
actual FR PPG at Colgate
NAHL 2022-23
0.57
actual FR PPG at Colgate

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2016-17
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2012-13
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.