← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson McGinley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-05-15 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Arizona State
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Chicago Steel USHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 — BCHL 52 14 14 28 0.538 0.2075 0.2133 0.7832 0.8052
2025-26 Coquitlam Express BCHL 49 17 18 35 0.714 0.2752 0.2728 1.0389 1.0299
2026-27 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 7 2 1 3 0.429 0.1575 0.1517 0.4530 0.4364
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25390
Forward overall
#1238
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Arizona State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.23
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
NAHL 2012-13
0.00
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
BCHL 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
WHL 2024-25
0.06
actual FR PPG at Arizona State

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2014-15
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Morrisville · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2024-25
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.