IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson McGinley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-05-15 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Arizona State
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Chicago Steel USHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 — BCHL 52 14 14 28 0.538 0.2075 0.2133 0.7837 0.8057
2025-26 Coquitlam Express BCHL 49 17 18 35 0.714 0.2752 0.2728 1.0395 1.0305
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25038
Forward overall
#1213
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Luc Gerdes
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Arizona State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cade Stibbe
NAHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Filips Buncis
NAHL 2016-17
0.05
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Anthony Croston
NAHL 2013-14
0.25
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Gage Mackie
NAHL 2016-17
0.00
actual FR PPG at Arizona State

D2/3 Comparables

Blake Tosto
Lebanon Valley · 2018-19
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Mueller
Gustavus Adolphus · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Willock
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2004-05
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.