← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wyatt Sypniewski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-09 Country: USA
Providence
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Fargo Force USHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 54 9 12 21 0.389 0.1429 0.1564 0.4105 0.4493
2025-26 Fargo Force USHL 50 5 1 6 0.120 0.0708 0.0710 0.3604 0.3612
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45181
Forward overall
#2035
Forward born in 2007
#3760
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

Providence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

AJHL 2012-13
0.00
actual FR PPG at Providence
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Providence
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.50
actual FR PPG at Providence
USHL 2017-18
0.12
actual FR PPG at Providence

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2003-04
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2010-11
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2019-20
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.