IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Wilfley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-06-30 Country: USA
2026 · Round 6, Pick #172  ·  New Jersey Devils New Jersey Devils
Arizona State
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Portland Winterhawks WHL 6 0 2 2 0.333 0.1622 0.1789 0.8178 0.9021
2025-26 Portland Winterhawks WHL 66 9 6 15 0.227 0.1106 0.1169 0.5577 0.5894
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#44599
Forward overall
#856
Forward born in 2008
#1410
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Ahlgren
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Bentley (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Humitz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dawson Cook
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Evancho
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Army (0.62 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Matt Mendelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Penn State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Arizona State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Braxton Whitehead
WHL 2021-22
0.06
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Teddy Lagerback
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.23
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Brendan Studioso
NA3HL 2016-17
0.33
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Filips Buncis
NAHL 2014-15
0.05
actual FR PPG at Arizona State

D2/3 Comparables

Savva Smirnov
Concordia · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott McKenzie
Hamilton · 2017-18
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Raphael Robitaille
Norwich · 2002-03
1.240 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.