IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zaide Penner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-07-08 Country: USA
North Dakota
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Fargo Force USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Fargo Force USHL 33 0 1 1 0.030 0.0179 0.0190 0.0909 0.0964
2026-27 Fargo Force USHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0983 0.0983 0.5002 0.5002
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31741
Defenseman overall
#1733
Defenseman born in 2008
#4493
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

North Dakota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Garrett Lindberg
USHS-MN 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
Jayden Jubenvill
MJHL 2021-22
0.16
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
Tanner Komzak
BCHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
Ryan Anderson
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at North Dakota

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Scanlon
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Herrmann
Utica · 2018-19
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Schwartzmiller
Concordia · 2018-19
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.