IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zaide Penner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-07-08 Country: USA
North Dakota
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Fargo Force USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Fargo Force USHL 33 0 1 1 0.030 0.0179 0.0190 0.0910 0.0965
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31448
Defenseman overall
#1592
Defenseman born in 2008
#4253
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Nash Worden
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Army (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Luke Shiplo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Teemu Kivihalme
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Anthony Walsh
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Beaulieu
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

North Dakota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ryan Anderson
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
Tanner Komzak
BCHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
Sam Laurila
USHL 2023-24
0.28
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
Gage Ausmus
USHL 2012-13
0.14
actual FR PPG at North Dakota

D2/3 Comparables

Cameron Patton
Utica · 2017-18
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Yoon
Bethel · 2022-23
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Kundinger
Beloit · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.