IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Brierley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-02-07 Country: USA
Brown
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Janesville Jets NAHL 41 3 12 15 0.366 0.1344 0.1454 — —
2025-26 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 54 3 11 14 0.259 0.1530 0.1514 0.7788 0.7707
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10361
Defenseman overall
#1410
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Brown Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jackson Munro
BCHL 2018-19
0.25
actual FR PPG at Brown
Max Gottlieb
AJHL 2013-14
0.68
actual FR PPG at Brown
Nick Traggio
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Brown
Will Scherer
NAHL 2014-15
0.00
actual FR PPG at Brown

D2/3 Comparables

Mason Emoff
Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alain Joanette
St. Norbert · 2005-06
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Gervais
Neumann · 2007-08
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.