← New Search ↗ Social Card

Finn De St. Hubert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-07-14 Country: USA
Yale
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 2 1 1 2 1.000 0.3853 0.4185 1.4544 1.5799
2025-26 Omaha Lancers USHL 57 1 10 11 0.193 0.1139 0.1152 0.5791 0.5856
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14606
Defenseman overall
#1932
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Yale Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.26
actual FR PPG at Yale
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Yale
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Yale
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.26
actual FR PPG at Yale

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2006-07
0.742 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.269 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.