← New Search ↗ Social Card

Avery Laliberte Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-09-18 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Northern Michigan
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Niverville Nighthawks MJHL 53 2 18 20 0.377 0.0726 0.0796 0.2380 0.2610
2024-25 Niverville Nighthawks MJHL 53 7 32 39 0.736 0.1416 0.1475 0.4640 0.4833
2025-26 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 62 3 7 10 0.161 0.0952 0.0924 0.4844 0.4700
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12743
Defenseman overall
#2392
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Northern Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2023-24
0.30
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
USHL 2015-16
0.12
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
SuperElit 2022-23
0.09
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2000-01
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 1995-96
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.