IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Schlechtweg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-04-16 Country: USA
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Kent School NE-Prep 26 8 9 17 0.654 0.1295 0.1295 0.2979 0.2979
2025-26 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 25 1 3 4 0.160 0.0944 0.0990 0.4805 0.5041
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18149
Forward overall
#250
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Nick Hutchison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Canisius (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Adam Winborg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kiefer Sherwood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Miami (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Riley Alferd
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
John Wiitala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

A.J. Drobot
NAHL 2015-16
0.26
actual FR PPG at Maine
Ryan Smith
USHL 2014-15
0.30
actual FR PPG at Maine
Will Gerrior
OHL 2021-22
0.26
actual FR PPG at Maine
Nick Peluso
USHL 2021-22
0.29
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Artjoms Koppass
Curry · 2017-18
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Haskins
Gustavus Adolphus · 2014-15
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Piccininno
Alvernia · 2021-22
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.