← New Search ↗ Social Card

Teddy Lechner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-08-22 Country: USA
2026 · Round 5, Pick #152  ·  Colorado Avalanche Colorado Avalanche
Augustana
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Academy of Holy Angels USHS-MN 27 6 12 18 0.667 0.0844 0.0844 0.1619 0.1619
2024-25 Academy of Holy Angels USHS-MN 25 5 23 28 1.120 0.1418 0.1418 0.2720 0.2720
2025-26 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 24 0 2 2 0.083 0.0491 0.0524 0.2502 0.2669
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5194
Defenseman overall
#344
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Army (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Augustana Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.39
actual FR PPG at Augustana
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Augustana
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.10
actual FR PPG at Augustana
NAHL 2022-23
0.28
actual FR PPG at Augustana

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2017-18
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.