← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Roelofs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-01-06 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
St. Thomas
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Holy Family USHS-MN 22 0 5 5 0.227 0.0288 0.0288 0.0552 0.0552
2022-23 Holy Family USHS-MN 26 14 15 29 1.115 0.1412 0.1412 — —
2023-24 Holy Family USHS-MN 26 16 15 31 1.192 0.1509 0.1509 0.2895 0.2895
2024-25 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 29 3 4 7 0.241 0.0887 0.0912 0.2551 0.2622
2025-26 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 26 0 1 1 0.038 0.0227 0.0212 0.1155 0.1080
2026-27 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 7 2 0 2 0.286 0.1101 0.1101 0.4155 0.4155
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#44200
Forward overall
#2703
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

St. Thomas Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.29
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.19
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2011-12
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.