← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Roelofs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-01-06 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
St. Thomas
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Holy Family USHS-MN 22 0 5 5 0.227 0.0288 0.0288 0.0552 0.0552
2022-23 Holy Family USHS-MN 26 14 15 29 1.115 0.1412 0.1412
2023-24 Holy Family USHS-MN 26 16 15 31 1.192 0.1509 0.1509 0.2896 0.2896
2024-25 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 29 3 4 7 0.241 0.0887 0.0912 0.2548 0.2619
2025-26 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 26 0 1 1 0.038 0.0227 0.0212 0.1156 0.1081
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43737
Forward overall
#2676
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

St. Thomas Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.19
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.27
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.29
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHL 2021-22
0.58
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas

D2/3 Comparables

Nazareth · 2016-17
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2008-09
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Michael's College · 2012-13
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.