IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James McMurray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-06-15 Country: Canada
Amherst
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0817 0.0915 0.2295 0.2572
2024-25 Berkshire School NE-Prep 33 12 20 32 0.970 0.1921 0.1921 0.4418 0.4418
2025-26 Berkshire School NE-Prep 32 23 23 46 1.438 0.2848 0.2848 0.6549 0.6549
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11659
Forward overall
#284
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

Amherst Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Keenan Hodgson
1.11
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Billy Collins
0.44
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Michael Rowbotham
0.64
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Oliver Flynn
1.06
actual FR PPG at Amherst

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Tyson
Hobart · 2015-16
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bo Webster
Hobart · 2010-11
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Omar Mullan
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2011-12
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.