← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wake Purdy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-31 Country: Canada
Western New England
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 45 13 19 32 0.711 0.1643 0.1750 0.3479 0.3706
2024-25 Navan Grads CCHL 24 11 7 18 0.750 0.1627 0.1595 0.5745 0.5632
2025-26 Navan Grads CCHL 55 9 13 22 0.400 0.0868 0.0803 0.3064 0.2833
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26899
Forward overall
#1523
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

Western New England Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.00
actual FR PPG at Western New England
0.33
actual FR PPG at Western New England
0.37
actual FR PPG at Western New England
0.88
actual FR PPG at Western New England

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.