← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Fickenscher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-08-27 Country: USA
Wentworth
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 22 0 2 2 0.091 0.0180 0.0180 0.0414 0.0414
2022-23 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 26 1 2 3 0.115 0.0229 0.0229 0.0526 0.0526
2023-24 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 30 0 2 2 0.067 0.0132 0.0132 0.0304 0.0304
2024-25 Seacoast Spartans NCDC 41 1 5 6 0.146 0.0596 0.0603 0.1176 0.1191
2025-26 NCDC 21 3 3 6 0.286 0.1165 0.1117 0.2296 0.2201
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15280
Defenseman overall
#2899
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Wentworth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.33
actual FR PPG at Wentworth
0.46
actual FR PPG at Wentworth
0.00
actual FR PPG at Wentworth
0.60
actual FR PPG at Wentworth

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2012-13
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2006-07
0.552 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.