IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Hooper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-05 Country: USA
Trine
NCHA D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 12 0 3 3 0.250 0.0578 0.0609 0.1223 0.1288
2024-25 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 43 21 44 65 1.512 0.1977 0.1914 0.5130 0.4965
2025-26 — NCDC 51 24 36 60 1.177 0.4797 0.4483 0.9457 0.8839
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
48%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5667
Forward overall
#170
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

Trine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Brendan Prappas
0.93
actual FR PPG at Trine
Justin Meers
0.64
actual FR PPG at Trine
Lucas Bombardier
0.56
actual FR PPG at Trine
Alexander Babich
0.80
actual FR PPG at Trine

D2/3 Comparables

Harrison Niemann
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Oldcorn
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Henderson
Marian · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.