← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Sherman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Sacred Heart
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Pomfret NE-Prep 26 1 1 2 0.077 0.0152 0.0152 0.0350 0.0350
2024-25 Pomfret NE-Prep 29 2 3 5 0.172 0.0342 0.0342 0.0785 0.0785
2025-26 Pomfret NE-Prep 27 5 10 15 0.556 0.1101 0.1101 0.2531 0.2531
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18221
Defenseman overall
#1056
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Sacred Heart Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.08
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.28
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
USHS-MN 2025-26
0.50
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
USHL 2017-18
0.33
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart

D2/3 Comparables

Augsburg · 2002-03
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2005-06
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2007-08
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.