← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Sherman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
Sacred Heart
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Pomfret NE-Prep 26 1 1 2 0.077 0.0155 0.0155 0.0352 0.0352
2024-25 Pomfret NE-Prep 29 2 3 5 0.172 0.0347 0.0347 0.0788 0.0788
2025-26 Pomfret NE-Prep 27 5 10 15 0.556 0.1117 0.1117 0.2541 0.2541
2026-27 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 9 1 1 2 0.222 0.0816 0.0816 0.2348 0.2348
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18483
Defenseman overall

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Sacred Heart Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2024-25
0.50
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.28
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.08
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
NAHL 2017-18
0.33
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart

D2/3 Comparables

Bowdoin · 2003-04
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2016-17
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.