IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominic Somma Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Berkshire School NE-Prep 33 3 13 16 0.485 0.0960 0.0960 0.2209 0.2209
2025-26 Berkshire School NE-Prep 32 3 17 20 0.625 0.1238 0.1238 0.2848 0.2848
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9606
Defenseman overall
#523
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Brad Zona
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army
Owen Nolan
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.12
actual FR PPG at Army
Andrew Garby
NAHL 2018-19
0.39
actual FR PPG at Army
Jude Brower
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.07
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Romeo
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lonny Forrester
St. Norbert · 2000-01
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Gamache
Hobart · 2009-10
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.