IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominic Somma Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Berkshire School NE-Prep 33 3 13 16 0.485 0.0975 0.0975 0.2217 0.2217
2025-26 Berkshire School NE-Prep 32 3 17 20 0.625 0.1257 0.1257 0.2858 0.2858
2026-27 — NAHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0525 0.0525 0.1510 0.1510
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9772
Defenseman overall

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Liam Chapman
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.20
actual FR PPG at Army
Jude Brower
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.07
actual FR PPG at Army
Mac Gadowsky
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.82
actual FR PPG at Army
Thomas Quast
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Beau Depencier
Manhattanville · 2022-23
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Morton
Fredonia · 2005-06
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Bestwick
SUNY Geneseo · 2000-01
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.