IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Wishart

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Colgate
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Chaska USHS-MN 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.1266 0.1266 0.2429 0.2429
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Colgate Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ben Raymond
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.20
actual FR PPG at Colgate
Ryan McGuire
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.11
actual FR PPG at Colgate
Jack Brandt
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.23
actual FR PPG at Colgate
Tyler Penner
MJHL 2013-14
0.10
actual FR PPG at Colgate

D2/3 Comparables

Wyatt Trumbley
Westfield State · 2012-13
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kasper Kjellkvist
Curry · 2015-16
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Mood
Chatham · 2017-18
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.