← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Gavin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-11-13 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
RPI
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Tri-City Americans WHL 9 1 1 2 0.222 0.1081 0.1266 0.5452 0.6384
2022-23 Tri-City Americans WHL 62 22 32 54 0.871 0.4237 0.4764 2.1372 2.4029
2023-24 Tri-City Americans WHL 68 23 45 68 1.000 0.4865 0.5230 2.4537 2.6378
2024-25 Tri-City Americans WHL 68 21 36 57 0.838 0.4078 0.4166 2.0567 2.1011
2025-26 Brandon Wheat Kings WHL 68 16 42 58 0.853 0.4149 0.4047 2.0928 2.0412
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8014
Forward overall
#235
Forward born in 2006
#273
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Boston University (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG

RPI Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.08
actual FR PPG at RPI
USHL 2017-18
0.36
actual FR PPG at RPI
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.17
actual FR PPG at RPI
USHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at RPI

D2/3 Comparables

Worcester State · 2023-24
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2006-07
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2002-03
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.