IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Morgan Hackman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-12-30 Country: Canada
Minnesota
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Wenatchee Wild WHL 25 0 1 1 0.040 0.0195 0.0210 0.0977 0.1053
2025-26 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 29 4 4 8 0.276 0.0925 0.0970 0.2553 0.2678
2026-27 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0551 0.0551 0.2078 0.2078
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#52693
Forward overall
#2623
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jackson Nevers
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
Tate Pritchard
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.32
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
Brooks Cullen
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
Beckett Hendrickson
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.31
actual FR PPG at Minnesota

D2/3 Comparables

Eliott Mikesch
Wisconsin-Superior · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brock Labelle
Castleton · 2010-11
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Hanewall
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.