IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Morgan Hackman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-12-30 Country: Canada
Minnesota
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Wenatchee Wild WHL 25 0 1 1 0.040 0.0195 0.0210 0.0981 0.1058
2025-26 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 29 4 4 8 0.276 0.0925 0.0970 0.2553 0.2678
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#52168
Forward overall
#2571
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Eastman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Cotton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bryan Basilico
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Félix Caron
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ RPI (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Beckett Hendrickson
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.31
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
Jimmy Clark
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.28
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
Mason Moe
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.36
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
Sam Rice
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Spolec
St. Olaf · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Fransky
Elmira · 2003-04
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Miller Rubin
Suffolk · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.