IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen McCarthy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-02-20 Country: USA
UMass Lowell
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 40 0 3 3 0.075 0.0289 0.0323 0.1091 0.1218
2025-26 Victoria Royals WHL 19 0 2 2 0.105 0.0512 0.0532 0.2572 0.2672
2026-27 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 5 1 1 2 0.400 0.1342 0.1342 0.3701 0.3701
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25104
Defenseman overall
#1400
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tim Davison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

UMass Lowell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ben Meehan
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.47
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
Mark Cooper
CCHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
Gabe Blanchard
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
Félix Plamondon
QMJHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Robertson
Suffolk · 2006-07
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick O'Sullivan
UMass Boston · 2003-04
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rob Turville
Wisconsin-Superior · 2002-03
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.