← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Powers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-17 Country: Canada
Alaska Fairbanks
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Brockville Braves CCHL 52 10 9 19 0.365 0.0793 0.0844 0.2827 0.3010
2023-24 Charlottetown Islanders QMJHL 67 7 23 30 0.448 0.2200 0.2185 1.1958 1.1874
2024-25 Charlottetown Islanders QMJHL 61 13 18 31 0.508 0.2497 0.2357 1.3570 1.2808
2025-26 Charlottetown Islanders QMJHL 54 15 20 35 0.648 0.3184 0.2855 1.7306 1.5516
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18700
Forward overall
#1002
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Fairbanks Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2022-23
0.89
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
MJHL 2023-24
0.10
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
NAHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
NAHL 2020-21
0.27
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2002-03
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2018-19
1.103 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.