← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jude Herron Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-04-29 Country: USA
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Charlottetown Islanders QMJHL 40 11 4 15 0.375 0.1842 0.2033 1.0011 1.1048
2025-26 Charlottetown Islanders QMJHL 55 5 12 17 0.309 0.1519 0.1605 0.8252 0.8717
2026-27 Charlottetown Islanders QMJHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1638 0.1638 0.8898 0.8898
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34661
Forward overall
#649
Forward born in 2008
#1025
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2016-17
0.26
actual FR PPG at Maine
NAHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Maine
USHL 2015-16
0.30
actual FR PPG at Maine
NAHL 2020-21
0.21
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2018-19
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2020-21
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2015-16
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.