IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jude Herron Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-04-29 Country: USA
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Charlottetown Islanders QMJHL 40 11 4 15 0.375 0.1842 0.2033 1.0014 1.1051
2025-26 Charlottetown Islanders QMJHL 55 5 12 17 0.309 0.1519 0.1605 0.8254 0.8719
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34212
Forward overall
#567
Forward born in 2008
#1010
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Nick Hutchison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Canisius (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Drew Callin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Bentley (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Mendelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Penn State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Evancho
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Army (0.62 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
John Wiitala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

A.J. Drobot
NAHL 2015-16
0.26
actual FR PPG at Maine
Ryan Smith
USHL 2014-15
0.30
actual FR PPG at Maine
Will Gerrior
OHL 2021-22
0.26
actual FR PPG at Maine
Thomas Freel
CCHL 2018-19
0.42
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Cox
Southern New Hampshire · 2014-15
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Wood
Utica · 2017-18
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Atkinson
Curry · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.