← New Search ↗ Social Card

Julien Wasmer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-08-06 Country: Canada
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 44 1 7 8 0.182 0.0394 0.0429 0.1407 0.1531
2023-24 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 44 6 27 33 0.750 0.1627 0.1683 0.5803 0.6004
2024-25 Chicoutimi Saguenéens QMJHL 41 1 13 14 0.342 0.1678 0.1623 0.9119 0.8819
2025-26 Saint John Sea Dogs QMJHL 63 1 10 11 0.175 0.0858 0.0789 0.4662 0.4288
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16341
Defenseman overall
#3041
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Maine
USHL 2018-19
0.17
actual FR PPG at Maine
MJHL 2016-17
0.59
actual FR PPG at Maine
BCHL 2021-22
0.29
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2016-17
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.