← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bradley Whang Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-05-06 Country: USA
Yale
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Shattuck St. Mary's 14U AAA 14u-aaa 55 27 46 73 1.327 — — — —
2024-25 Shattuck St. Mary's 15U AAA 15u-aaa 61 40 81 121 1.984 — — — —
2025-26 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U AAA 16u-aaa 53 31 61 92 1.736 — — — —
2026-27 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1966 0.1966 1.0001 1.0001
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Army (0.62 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ RPI (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Canisius (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Yale Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2021-22
0.20
actual FR PPG at Yale
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.40
actual FR PPG at Yale
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Yale
USHL 2015-16
0.43
actual FR PPG at Yale

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2014-15
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2007-08
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.