← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Charron Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-06-15 Country: USA
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 NAHL 51 2 22 24 0.471 0.1729 0.1819 0.4967 0.5226
2024-25 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 46 5 26 31 0.674 0.2597 0.2551 0.9807 0.9634
2025-26 BCHL 51 5 16 21 0.412 0.1587 0.1501 0.5993 0.5667
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7308
Defenseman overall
#1736
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.12
actual FR PPG at Army
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.07
actual FR PPG at Army
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army
USPHL-Premier-Classic 2014-15
0.07
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Castleton · 2010-11
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2008-09
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.