← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Bartkowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-06-07 Country: USA
SUNY Oswego
SUNYAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Northeast Generals NAHL 44 1 9 10 0.227 0.0835 0.0878 0.2399 0.2521
2024-25 Northeast Generals NAHL 29 4 6 10 0.345 0.1267 0.1265 0.3639 0.3634
2025-26 Northeast Generals NAHL 32 10 19 29 0.906 0.3329 0.3160 0.9565 0.9080
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23861
Forward overall
#1344
Forward born in 2005
#1833
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

SUNY Oswego Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.71
actual FR PPG at SUNY Oswego
0.85
actual FR PPG at SUNY Oswego
1.08
actual FR PPG at SUNY Oswego
0.56
actual FR PPG at SUNY Oswego

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2008-09
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2023-24
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.