IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shawn Leary Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-05-12 Country: USA
Connecticut College
Verbal NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep 26 4 1 5 0.192 0.0387 0.0387 0.0879 0.0879
2023-24 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep 27 4 7 11 0.407 0.0819 0.0819 0.1863 0.1863
2024-25 Surrey Eagles BCHL 31 6 10 16 0.516 0.1989 0.1945 0.7506 0.7339
2025-26 — BCHL 53 6 11 17 0.321 0.1236 0.1163 0.4666 0.4390
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10683
Defenseman overall
#2247
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Connecticut College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

William Lawrence
0.52
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Ryan McKenna
0.79
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Jeff Thompson
0.64
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Tim Kobler
0.80
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Economos
Plymouth State · 2012-13
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Payton Felix
Manhattanville · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Ring
Fredonia · 2023-24
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.