IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luc Lampert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-06-24 Country: USA
Connecticut College
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Brunswick NE-Prep 27 0 2 2 0.074 0.0147 0.0147 0.0338 0.0338
2023-24 Brunswick NE-Prep 33 1 2 3 0.091 0.0180 0.0180 0.0414 0.0414
2024-25 — NAHL 34 1 5 6 0.176 0.0648 0.0649 0.1863 0.1865
2025-26 Cornwall Colts CCHL 19 1 16 17 0.895 0.1941 0.1801 0.6922 0.6424
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6106
Defenseman overall
#1506
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Connecticut College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Michael Paul Capozzi
0.78
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Arthur Mirante
0.52
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Greg Pezza
0.30
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Jordan Gray
0.61
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College

D2/3 Comparables

Dylan Giorgio
Bethel · 2018-19
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Stuermer
Marian · 2011-12
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
James Tatro
Salem State · 2023-24
1.269 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.