IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Henry Hlinka Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-09-06 Country: USA
Augustana
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Chippewa Steel NAHL 16 1 3 4 0.250 0.0919 0.1022 0.2639 0.2934
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16977
Defenseman overall
#919
Defenseman born in 2008
#5258
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Phil Beaulieu
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Anthony Walsh
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Keaton Thompson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Morrison
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Northland
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nash Worden
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Army (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Augustana Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Carter Theissen
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Augustana
Easton Young
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.39
actual FR PPG at Augustana
Will Svenddal
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.10
actual FR PPG at Augustana
Landon Fandel
NAHL 2022-23
0.28
actual FR PPG at Augustana

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Dobles
Wilkes · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Simon Sagissor
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2014-15
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Egor Borshchev
Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.