IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Watson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
Salve Regina
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 — NAHL 28 1 3 4 0.143 0.0525 0.0525 0.1508 0.1508
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24650
Defenseman overall
#6476
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Salve Regina Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Egor Borshchev
0.20
actual FR PPG at Salve Regina
Colin Richard
0.00
actual FR PPG at Salve Regina
Brendan Kim
0.54
actual FR PPG at Salve Regina
Cameron Boudreau
0.00
actual FR PPG at Salve Regina

D2/3 Comparables

Beau Depencier
Manhattanville · 2022-23
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Morton
Fredonia · 2005-06
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Bestwick
SUNY Geneseo · 2000-01
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.