← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conrado Calderini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-03-07 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Berkshire School NE-Prep 31 2 5 7 0.226 0.0447 0.0447 0.1029 0.1029
2024-25 Powell River Kings BCHL 26 0 2 2 0.077 0.0296 0.0302 0.1119 0.1140
2025-26 Powell River Kings BCHL 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0482 0.0473 0.1819 0.1786
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27334
Defenseman overall
#4093
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
NE-Prep 2020-21
0.09
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
USHL 2012-13
0.05
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
USHL 2018-19
0.07
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

Nichols · 2006-07
0.483 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2015-16
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.