IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nikita Ivashchenko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-08 Country: Ukraine
Stonehill
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 44 23 27 50 1.136 0.2911 0.2833 0.8566 0.8337
2025-26 Blackfalds Bulldogs BCHL 53 31 38 69 1.302 0.5016 0.4656 1.8947 1.7587
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8055
Forward overall
#306
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

Stonehill Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Frank Ireland
NCDC 2021-22
1.76
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
Jake LaRusso
NAHL 2022-23
0.26
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
Justin Barker
AJHL 2022-23
0.29
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
Joel Lehtinen
NAHL 2023-24
0.30
actual FR PPG at Stonehill

D2/3 Comparables

Arvega Hovsepyan
Salve Regina · 2023-24
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Miller
Adrian · 2006-07
1.679 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Kneeland
Lake Forest · 2004-05
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.