← New Search ↗ Social Card

Indiana Grossbard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-12-21 Country: USA
Dartmouth
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep 25 2 2 4 0.160 0.0322 0.0322 0.0732 0.0732
2023-24 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep 20 14 18 32 1.600 0.3218 0.3218 0.7317 0.7317
2024-25 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 26 26 16 42 1.615 0.3249 0.3249 0.7387 0.7387
2025-26 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 54 12 14 26 0.481 0.1855 0.1987 0.7003 0.7503
2026-27 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 7 1 2 3 0.429 0.1651 0.1651 0.6234 0.6234
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13602
Forward overall
#373
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Dartmouth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.56
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.25
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth

D2/3 Comparables

St. Olaf · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2002-03
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.