← New Search ↗ Social Card

Indiana Grossbard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-12-21 Country: USA
Dartmouth
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep 25 2 2 4 0.160 0.0317 0.0317 0.0729 0.0729
2023-24 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep 20 14 18 32 1.600 0.3170 0.3170 0.7290 0.7290
2024-25 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 26 26 16 42 1.615 0.3200 0.3200 0.7360 0.7360
2025-26 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 54 12 14 26 0.481 0.1855 0.1987 0.7007 0.7507
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13334
Forward overall
#346
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Dartmouth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.56
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.66
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.29
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2007-08
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2016-17
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.