← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Morgan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-07-18 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Omaha Lancers USHL 51 9 5 14 0.275 0.1619 0.1635 0.8244 0.8327
2025-26 Omaha Lancers USHL 59 9 22 31 0.525 0.3099 0.2980 1.5780 1.5176
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20342
Forward overall
#899
Forward born in 2006
#1977
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.25
actual FR PPG at Army
NAHL 2012-13
0.67
actual FR PPG at Army
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.63
actual FR PPG at Army
BCHL 2021-22
0.49
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2012-13
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.