← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rudolfs Berzkalns Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-03-03 Country: Latvia
2026 · Round 2, Pick #58  ·  Edmonton Oilers Edmonton Oilers
Boston College
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 43 5 3 8 0.186 0.1097 0.1197 0.5581 0.6091
2025-26 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 48 13 12 25 0.521 0.3072 0.3204 1.5628 1.6301
2026-27 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1966 0.1966 1.0001 1.0001
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23644
Forward overall
#399
Forward born in 2008
#2485
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Boston College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Boston College
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.18
actual FR PPG at Boston College
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.09
actual FR PPG at Boston College
NE-Prep 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Boston College

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2025-26
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tufts · 2020-21
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.