← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rudolfs Berzkalns Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-03-03 Country: Latvia
2026 · Round 2, Pick #58  ·  Edmonton Oilers Edmonton Oilers
Boston College
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 43 5 3 8 0.186 0.1097 0.1197 0.5586 0.6096
2025-26 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 48 13 12 25 0.521 0.3072 0.3204 1.5642 1.6315
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23290
Forward overall
#340
Forward born in 2008
#2273
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Providence (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Penn State (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Boston College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2022-23
0.18
actual FR PPG at Boston College
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.17
actual FR PPG at Boston College
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.79
actual FR PPG at Boston College
USHL 2016-17
0.84
actual FR PPG at Boston College

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2019-20
1.292 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.