← New Search ↗ Social Card

Victor Mannebratt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-16 Country: Sweden
Alaska Anchorage
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Frölunda HC U20 SHL-J20 22 0 3 3 0.136 0.0758 0.0790 0.1817 0.1895
2023-24 Frölunda HC U20 SuperElit 45 3 12 15 0.333 0.1315 0.1307 0.4527 0.4499
2024-25 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 46 12 29 41 0.891 0.3275 0.3247
2025-26 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 32 8 8 16 0.500 0.1837 0.1731 0.5278 0.4973
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4643
Defenseman overall
#1191
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Anchorage Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2021-22
0.08
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
BCHL 2017-18
0.30
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
NAHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
NAHL 2021-22
0.18
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage

D2/3 Comparables

Tufts · 2023-24
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2017-18
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.