IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brody Berard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2009-09-02 Country: USA
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 45 1 6 7 0.156 0.0918 0.1026 0.4673 0.5225
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17858
Defenseman overall
#247
Defenseman born in 2009
#3866
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Butrus Ghafari
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Bliss
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Cornell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Fortunato
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston University (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
John MacLeod
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Boston University (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nathan Billitier
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jackson Dorrington
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.17
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
Kyle Furey
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
Nolan Hayes
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.14
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
Michael Fisher
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.07
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

Ethan Mulhearn
Hobart · 2015-16
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Favaro
Curry · 2013-14
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Shinkaruk
Elmira · 2008-09
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.