← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bode Wise Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-05-31 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Ferris State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 59 3 14 17 0.288 0.1058 0.1108 0.3041 0.3186
2025-26 Tri-City Storm USHL 17 0 2 2 0.118 0.0694 0.0663 0.3532 0.3374
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18708
Defenseman overall
#3155
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Ferris State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2015-16
0.23
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
NAHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
AJHL 2018-19
0.10
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
USHL 2017-18
0.43
actual FR PPG at Ferris State

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2010-11
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.